Walt Disney, a paradigm of morality and virtue, also created an adaptation of Carroll's Alice. Disney's adaptation of the book was obviously, easily arguably for a innocent audience. The Disney Wonderland was exactly that, a place of wonder. Set in a ubercolored, forest, dreamworld, Disney's Alice may have the misfortune of constantly encountering obstacles, but the vast and vibrant color scheme and melodic and upbeat soundtrack constantly reassure the viewer that everything will turn out okay. The Disney Alice is propelled through a world much closer to that of Carroll's creation. The creatures she encounter are close representations of the originals drawn by John Tenniel, anr though at times may present a threat to Alice, they are (for the most part) drawn in a manner not to impose much fear or unease in Alice or the viewer.
When comparing the two films, it is easy to conclude that 's Jan Švankmajer's Alice is far more adult both in it's tone and screen images than its Walt Disney counterpart. Though, that is not to say that adult orientation of the book is bad, Carroll did in fact write the story with many adult subtleties, it is just the opinion of this author that Wonderland should represent something I want to wonder about, and Švankmajer's world of Alice is not one of them.
Broken cogs and mistreated ratchets numb the viewers mind with paralytic viciousness.
ReplyDeleteSheer poetry! :)
The Disney Wonderland was exactly that, a place of wonder.
For me, a place of boredom, restiveness, and frustration. Similar feelings come up for me when watching Švankmajer, but for different reasons. The difference is, I don't think Disney intended to bring up those feelings. :)
I find that the Disney film flattens out Carroll's book with tedious moralizing, and has no understanding of Alice at all, whereas Švankmajer at least avoids making things obvious.
A well composed response here, though a bit hasty from my POV. I like the fact that you pick a position and argue it decisively.